Music in the Air, part 2
Monday, August 1, 2011 at 10:45PM Why should your favorite band have to hire you if you want to create a video for your favorite song?
Fan-created videos are nothing new. Some people have been doing it for a long time. Some bands have actively encouraged it, going so far as to hold fan video competitions. I think fan-created videos - and I don't mean photo montages or an iPhone recording of a concert - should be a huge part of the musical landscape. I really feel that, if things were right, fan videos would be every bit as important as artist-created videos.
There are a few gotchas with this. The big one is intellectual property (IP), a horrible plague of mindless litigation that does little more than stifle culture (to be clear, I draw a line between copyright - which was originally designed to reasonably protect creators and publishers - and IP which is an unfettered, nebulous concept aimed at protecting wealth at whatever cost). I learned some things about music licensing with the 52 Weeks Project and I'm applying them to my next project - one that combines my loves of film, music, and technology.
In August I'll be unveilng a new website focused on user-generated music video content. There will be more details with the launch, but for now I'll end by asking the question I started this post with in a different way:
If your ability to make a video for your favorite song were set free, what would that video be?
Music Video,
copyright,
intellectual property,
ip,
music,
videos | in
News,
Rant |
6 Comments